| |
Introduction
A Materials Concept Inventory (MCI) assessment instrument is being
developed to measure misconceptions about materials structure,
processing, and properties. It will be used to examine student
knowledge before and after teaching introductory materials engineering
courses that are required by many engineering colleges. Considerable
research shows that prior misconceptions are strongly held even
in the face of good instruction. A better understanding of "prior
knowledge" can help instructors improve instruction in their
classes.
Status
The current version of the MCI is a beta version which is being
administered this fall to students in larger classes at Texas
A&M and Arizona State University. An earlier alpha version
was created and tested for subject matter in an introductory materials
science and engineering course (see preliminary testing). If you
are interested in examining a copy of the MCI or using it to assess
the qualitative understanding of your students, please contact
one of the principal developers.
Principal Developers
Development Process
To create the test, a literature survey of current assessment
tools in science, math, and engineering disciplines was conducted
in conjunction with extensive student interactions. Student input
consisted of: weekly short-answer, open-ended questions; multiple
choice quizzes; and weekly interviews and discussions.
Preliminary Testing
After developing the alpha version of the MCI, it was administered
to a summer 2002 session of an introductory materials course of
13 students. At the end of the class it was again administered
to the 12 students still in the class. The data from these two
tests were then compiled and assessed. Initial exam scores of
about 36% correct were 15% higher than a completely random distribution
of 21%, and exit exam scores were somewhat higher at 45% correct.
The results were compared to assessment criteria from extensive
data on the well-tested Force
Concepts Inventory (FCI). The gain, g, in conceptual knowledge
for the MCI test of 15% was classified as a "low-g"-gain
for students in the summer course. FCI assessment methods define
"low-g" as a gain of less than 0.3, medium gain as 0.3-0.7,
and high gain as 0.7 and greater. FCI assessment data has found
that "low-g"-gain, typical of that found in lecture-only
courses, can be enhanced by engaging students with active learning
methods, which often increases gains to 70% and higher. Although
the first MCI results have limited statistics, they suggest that
utilizing more active-learning methods in introductory materials
engineering courses may increase conceptual knowledge gains.
|
|
References for Further Information
- Hestenes, David, Malcolm Wells, and Gregg Swackhamer,
1992. Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30
(3), 141151.
- Hestenes, David, and Ibrahim Halloun, 1995.
Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher,
33 (8).
- Halloun, Ibrahim, and David Hestenes, 1985.
The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American
Journal of Physics, 53(11), 10431055.
- Halloun,
Ibrahim, and David Hestenes, 1985. Common sense concepts about
motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 10561065.
- Evans, D.L., and David
Hestenes, "The Concept of the Concept Inventory Assessment
Instrument, Proceedings, 2001 Frontiers in Education Conference,
Reno, Nevada, 1013 October 2001.
- Krause, S. J., Decker, J.C., Niska, J., Alford, T. and Griffin,
R.B. (2002). "Materials Concept Inventory for Introductory
Materials Engineering Courses", Proceedings, National Educators
Workshop Update 2002: Standard Experiments in Engineering Materials,
Science, and Technology, October 13-16, 2002, San Jose, CA.
- Evans, D.L., Midkiff, C., Miller, R., Morgan, J., Krause, S.,
Martin, J., Notaros, B.M., Rancour, D., and Wage, K. (2002). "Tools
for Assessing Conceptual Understanding in the Engineering Sciences",
Proceedings, Frontiers in Education Conference, November
6-9, 2002, Boston, MA.
- Krause, S. J., Decker, J.C., Niska, J., Alford, T. and Griffin,
R. (2003). "Identifying
Student Misconceptions in Introductory Materials Engineering Classes",
Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference, Nashville, TN, June
2003.
- Krause, S. J., Decker, and Griffin, R.B., "Using
a Materials Concept Inventory to Assess Conceptual Gain in Introductory
Materials Engineering Courses", Proceedings, Frontiers
in Education Conference, November 5-8, 2003, Boulder, CO, USA
- Evans, D.L., Gray, D., Krause, S., Martin, J., Midkiff, C.,
Notaros, B.M., Pavelich, M., Rancour, D., Reed-Rhoads, T., Steif,
P., Streveler, R., and Wage, K. (2003). "Progress
on Concept Inventory Assessment Tools", Proceedings,
Frontiers in Education Conference, November 5-8, 2003, Boulder,
CO, USA.
- Krause, S., Tasooji, A., and Griffin, R. (2004) "Origins
of Misconceptions in a Materials Concept Inventory From Student
Focus Groups," Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference
Back
Web Resources
Jordan, W., Cardenas, H, and O'Neal, C. B., (2005).
Using
a Materials Concept Inventory to Assess an Introductory Materials
Class: Potential and Problems. Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference
and Exposition
Abstract: In every engineering course there is a concern
about how much the students are actually learning. The physics
community has addressed this through the development of an assessment
instrument called the Force Concept Inventory. More recently this
has been expanded to the development of Engineering Concept Inventories.
Universities affiliated with the N.S.F. sponsored Foundation Coalition
have developed a number of these inventories.
A Materials Concept Inventory has been developed by faculty from
Arizona State University and Texas A & M University. They
have reported on their work at the 2003 and 2004 A.S.E.E. Annual
Conferences1,2. They have encouraged further refinement of the
inventory as a way to help measure the effectiveness of introductory
materials
engineering courses. A Beta version of this inventory has been
graciously provided to Louisiana Tech University.
This inventory has been used in seven different sections of our
introductory materials engineering course taught during the 2003-2004
and 2004-2005 school years. Approximately 210 students have taken
the inventory at the beginning and end of the course. The use
of this assessment instrument in our course has provided insight
into
what is being taught effectively and what areas need improvement.
There was a reasonably good correlation between student performance
on the inventory post test and the student grade in the course.
|
 |
 |
©
2001 Foundation Coalition. All rights reserved. Last modified
|
 |
| |
|