Active/Collaborative Learning Student Teams Integrating Technology Effectively Women and Minorities Assessment and Evaluation EC2000 Emerging Technology Foundation Coalition Curricula Concept Inventories
 
 
 
 
 
Forming Student Engineering Teams
 
Example No. 3:Russ Pimmel, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama
  • I use teams for a four- or five-week design project in a senior-level course for CompE, CS and EE majors.
  • I form teams of three or four on the basis of a survey of preferred meeting times (MWF, TR, SS -- morning, afternoon, evening) and grades in prerequisite courses. I assign teams so that they haveĀ·
    • at least two common preferred work times,
    • heterogeneous capabilities, as indicated by prerequisite grades, and
    • a mix of majors
  • Since this is a senior-level course, I don't consider gender and ethnicity.
  • I give a brief training session on teaming, including ideas for effective teamwork.
  • On a weekly basis, team members individually and confidentially assess the team's progress, activity level, and effectiveness using a three-value scale (adequate, almost adequate, inadequate). They also report any special problems and any "slackers".
  • I briefly meet with teams with problems and talk to the slackers.
  • At the end of the project:
    • I grade group project reports and individual quizzes
    • Each student evaluates teammates and reports the percent of total effort for each. (Using "effort" allows subjective accommodations.)
    • I "average" peer data to get an individual effort score
    • I use the effort scores to compute individual report grades from the group grade and a team quiz grade from the individual grades. I then average individual and team grades for each student

Back to Last Page | Forward to Next Page

References Cited

  1. Katzenbach, J.R., and Smith, D.K., 1992. Wisdom of Teams: Boston (Harvard Business School Press).
  2. Dipinto, V.M., and Turner, S.V., 1997. Students and teacher as co-conspirators in learning. Current Iss. Mid. Level Ed., 6:29-39.
  3. Feichtner, S.B., and Davis, E.A., 1984-85. Why Some Groups Fail: A Survey of Students' Experiences with Learning Groups. Organizat. Behav. Teaching Rev., 9:58-71.
  4. Brickell, J.L., Porter, D.B., Reynolds, M.F., and Cosgrave, R.D., 1994. Assigning students to groups for engineering design projects: A comparison of five methods. J. Engr. Ed., 7:259-262.
  5. Davis, B.G., 1993. Tools for Teaching: San Francisco (Jossey-Bass).
  6. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K.A., 1991. Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-FRIC Higher Ed. Rpt. 4. George Washington U.
  7. Felder, R.M., and Brent, R., 1994. Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls, and Payoffs. ERIC Doc. Reprod. Serv. Rpt. ED 377038.
  8. Brower, ??[Jeff: Need more info here]
  9. Kanter, E.M., 1977. Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses in token women. Am. J. Sociol., 82:965-990.
  10. Allmandinger, J., and Hackman, J.R., 1995. The More the Better? Social Forces, 74:423-460.
  11. Cohen, L.L., and Swin, J.K., 1995. The Differential Impact of Gender Ratios on Women and Men: Tokenism, Self-Confidence, and Expectations. Personality Social Psych. Bull., 21:876-884.
  12. Steele, C.M., 1997. A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance. Am. Psychologist, 52:613-629.
  13. Haag, S.G., 2000. Teaming Backlash: Reframing Female Engineering Students. Proceed., 2000 ASEE Conf.
  14. Kautman et. al., 2000. Accounting for Individual Effort in Cooperative Learning Teams. J. Engineering Ed. 89:133-140

References for Further Information

  1. Bouton, C., and Garth R. (Eds.), 1983. Learning in Groups: San Francisco (Jossey-Bass).
  2. Bruffee, K., 1995. Sharing our Toys: Cooperative Learning versus Collaborative Learning. Change.
  3. Cohen, E., 1972. Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom: New York (Teacher's College Press).
  4. Cooper, J., et al., 1990. Cooperative Learning and College Instruction: Effective Use of Student Learning Teams.
  5. Fisher, K., Rayner, S., and Belgard, W., 1995. Tips for Teams: A Ready Reference for Solving Common Team Problems.
  6. Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, F.P., 2000. Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills (7th ed.): Boston (Allyn and Bacon).
  7. Scholtes, P.R., et al., 1988. The Team Handbook: How to Use Teams to Improve Quality: (Joiner Assoc.).
  8. Smith, K.A. 2000. Project management and teamwork. New York: McGraw-Hill BEST series.
 

Pilihan Pasar Angka Lengkap di Bandar Togel Terpercaya Internasional

Kami adalah Bandar Togel Terpercaya unggulan dengan pilihan pasar angka yang paling lengkap. Kami telah menjalin kerjasama dengan penyedia pasar angka dari berbagai negara. Selain itu, situs ini juga diakui secara resmi sebagai otoritas dalam permainan angka online internasional, menjadikannya tempat terbaik bagi para penggemar permainan ini.

Pasaran Hong Kong dan Sydney selalu menjadi pilihan populer bagi pemain togel. Situs Togel online resmi ini menyediakan kedua pasaran tersebut dengan jaminan keamanan dan keadilan dalam setiap pengundian. Pemain dapat menikmati berbagai fitur menarik yang akan menambah pengalaman bermain.

Platform togel IDN menawarkan berbagai pasaran menarik, salah satunya adalah pasaran Macau yang dikenal dengan jackpot besar. Para pemain memiliki peluang memenangkan hadiah fantastis dengan mengikuti permainan ini. dengan sistem yang transparan dan layanan customer service yang selalu siap membantu, Situs Togel menjadikan pengalaman bermain lebih menyenangkan dan bebas dari kekhawatiran.

Related Links:

Togel178

Pedetogel

Sabatoto

Togel279

Togel158

Colok178

Novaslot88

Lain-Lain

Partner Links